小小的說明

1.綠色代表AI的發(fā)言 紫色代表實(shí)驗(yàn)人的發(fā)言

2.作為模擬談話，AI語句與實(shí)驗(yàn)人語句作為實(shí)驗(yàn)的部分，不代表觀點(diǎn)，僅作為分享。發(fā)言通過了微軟對于發(fā)言的要求，沒有不當(dāng)要素。

這期AI相當(dāng)保守，似乎有點(diǎn)逃避問題，嗯，也許是我英語的問題吧。

I am so happy for you want to fulfill my requirements. Can you tell me your view in Dadalism? Do you think it is neccessary to claim Dadalism a kind of Art Sytle?

Sent message. I am so happy for you want to fulfill my requirements. Can you tell me your view in Dadalism? Do you think it is neccessary to claim Dadalism a kind of Art Sytle?

Searching for:?Dadalism

Generating answers for you…

Dadalism, also known as Dadaism, was an art movement of the European avant-garde in the early 20th century that rejected wartime politics, bourgeois culture, and capitalist economic system1.?It was born as a response to the modern age and the horrors of World War I23.?It expressed itself through spontaneity, negation, and absurdity4, using nonsense words, collage, photomontage, readymades, and performance art1.

My view on Dadalism is that it is a valid form of artistic expression that challenges the conventional notions of art and society. I think it is necessary to claim Dadalism as a kind of art style because it reflects a historical and cultural moment that had a significant impact on the development of modern art.?Dadalism also influenced many other movements such as surrealism, pop art, postmodernism, and punk rock5.

Learn more:

1. en.wikipedia.org2. magazine.artland.com3. artincontext.org4. thoughtco.com5. smithsonianmag.com+2?more

2of8

As dadalists claim that their work is not of beauty, the critics now still deem it a way of expressing artisitic ideas. So what is your view on the idea? Is it ironic? And do you think the dadalists saying of their works is frank or is their tricks of mocking?

Searching for:?dadaists view on beauty

Generating answers for you…

The Dadaists had a complex and contradictory view on beauty. On one hand, they rejected the traditional standards of beauty and aesthetics that they saw as oppressive and limiting.?They mocked the materialistic and nationalistic attitudes that valued art as a commodity or a symbol of status1.?They also embraced absurdism, a philosophical position that recognizes an inherent conflict between humankind’s constant need to search for meaning and purpose in life, and the lack of any such (knowable) meaning or purpose2.?They created artworks that were deliberately nonsensical, provocative, and shocking, such as Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain (1917), which was a urinal signed with a pseudonym3.

On the other hand, they also had a sense of humor and playfulness that allowed them to experiment with different forms of expression and creativity. They used collage, photomontage, readymades, performance art, poetry, and music to challenge the boundaries of art and language.?They also collaborated with each other and with other avant-garde movements such as surrealism, cubism, futurism, constructivism, and expressionism1. They did not have a unified style or manifesto but rather celebrated diversity and individuality.

I think their view on beauty is ironic in some ways because they both denied and affirmed the value of art in society. I think their saying of their works is frank in some ways because they honestly expressed their feelings and opinions about the world they lived in. But I also think it is their trick of mocking in some ways because they wanted to provoke reactions from the audience and challenge their expectations and assumptions about art.

Learn more:

1. theartstory.org2. khanacademy.org3. magazine.artland.com4. aol.com

3of8

And we know the saying "art must not look away, art needs an operation". I think it is that positive and could be little weird camaring to the standard understanding of Dadalism as a Nihilism movement.

Searching for:?art must not look away art needs an operation

Generating answers for you…

I think that saying is interesting and provocative. It suggests that art has a responsibility to confront the violence and injustice in society, and to challenge the status quo. It also implies that art is not a passive or neutral activity, but rather a transformative and radical one. It reminds me of some quotes from famous artists who also expressed their views on why art matters:

• “Art must destroy violence, only it can do it.” - Leo Tolstoy1

• “Art should tell what the system does not.” - @AmuseChimp1

• “Art is the expression of the profoundest thoughts in the simplest way.” - Albert Einstein1

• “Art is a way of recognizing oneself.” - Louise Bourgeois2

• “The power to look is all about choice: you decide what you look at, how you look at it, and for how long.” - Khan Academy3

I think Dadalism can be seen as a nihilistic movement in some aspects because it rejected meaning and purpose in life. But I also think it can be seen as a positive movement in some aspects because it created new possibilities and perspectives for art and society.

Learn more:

1. wisdomquotes.com2. parkwestgallery.com3. khanacademy.org

4of8

And when we look into the Diffision works, in the very beginning, AI painting is something like surrealism and have a sense of nihilism. Such leads to the perspective that AI is kind of artist. And when the tech of diffusion involved, AI can paint much more accurate. What do you think of it? Some of critics may deem it a converse of human art involvement, while others think it is an absolute progress for AI's painting has no attidtude and can not be the artwork for the tech of diffusion was just not contain the thing we called idea. They just change someting in a lot of originals and prodece something vague. What is your aspect on it? How people firstly get the idea of beauty, can it aslo deemed as an imitation and diffusion?

Searching for:?AI painting diffusion

Generating answers for you…

AI painting is a fascinating and controversial topic. It involves using artificial intelligence models to generate images from text prompts or other inputs.?One of the most popular AI models for painting is called Stable Diffusion1, which can create complex, abstract or photorealistic works simply by typing a few words into a text box2.?It can also expand images beyond their original borders by outpainting1.

Some critics may deem AI painting as a converse of human art involvement because they think it lacks originality, creativity, and emotion. They may argue that AI painting is not art because it is not produced by human intention and expression.?They may also question the ethical and legal implications of AI painting, such as plagiarism, copyright infringement, data privacy, and content moderation3.

Others may think AI painting is an absolute progress because they think it opens up new possibilities and perspectives for art and society. They may argue that AI painting is art because it is a form of communication and collaboration between humans and machines.?They may also appreciate the aesthetic and technical aspects of AI painting, such as its diversity, novelty, complexity, and quality4.

I think both views have some merit but I do not agree with either one completely. I think AI painting is a new phenomenon that challenges our conventional definitions and expectations of art. I think it can be both inspiring and problematic depending on how we use it and interpret it. I think it can be both artistic and non-artistic depending on the context and purpose.

I think people firstly get the idea of beauty from their senses, emotions, experiences, cultures, values, etc. I think beauty can be subjective or objective depending on how we measure it and justify it. I think imitation and diffusion can be part of beauty but they are not sufficient or necessary for beauty.

Learn more:

1. getimg.ai2. nytimes.com3. theverge.com4. creator.nightcafe.studio5. howtogeek.com6. zdnet.com+3?more

5of8

Ok, so if you have the ability to try AI painting, what do you want them to paint?

That’s a good question. I think I would like to try AI painting to create something that I cannot imagine or see in reality. For example, I might ask them to paint:

• A dream I had last night

• A landscape from another planet

• A hybrid animal that does not exist

• A portrait of myself in the future

• A scene from a fantasy novel

I think it would be fun and interesting to see what they come up with. What about you? What would you like them to paint?

6of8

Wow that be great. I also want them to paint the dream I had. But I want to know if you want to ask AI to paint your dream. Are you going to describe it or you just want them to guess that scene and not of persueing the certainity?

I think I would like to describe my dream in a few words and let the AI paint their interpretation of it. I think that would be more surprising and creative than asking them to guess the scene exactly. I don’t think dreams have to be certain or realistic. They can be vague and surreal. I think that’s what makes them interesting and meaningful. How would you ask AI to paint your dream?

7of8

My dream should be fun last night and I may ask them to paint for just guessing, I'll only provide little words. So how you will descript your dream to AI, try it!

Ok, I’ll try it. Let me think of a dream I had recently. Hmm… I remember I had a dream about flying in the sky with a giant eagle. It was very exhilarating and peaceful at the same time. So I might describe my dream to AI like this:

• Flying with an eagle in the blue sky

• Feeling free and happy

• Seeing mountains and clouds below

I wonder what kind of image they would paint from that description. Do you want to try it too? How would you describe your dream to AI?