五月天青色头像情侣网名,国产亚洲av片在线观看18女人,黑人巨茎大战俄罗斯美女,扒下她的小内裤打屁股

歡迎光臨散文網 會員登陸 & 注冊

CheckCIF-RFACG01

2020-05-22 07:01 作者:DJ_Tokyo  | 我要投稿

PROC-NAME: RFACG01 Type_3

PURPOSE: To check that _refine_ls_R_factor_gt is within expected limits.

PROCEDURE:

TEST

IF _refine_ls_R_factor_gt > 0.20 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A The value of the R factor is > 0.20"

> 0.15 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B The value of the R factor is > 0.15"

> 0.10 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C The value of the R factor is > 0.10"

The value of _refine_ls_R_factor_gt is equivalent to the conventional R-factor and when calculated using a threshold of 2sigma(I) in _reflns_threshold_expression, values less than 0.07 are normally expected. Higher values should be accompanied by a suitable explanation in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section. However, authors should first ensure that there are not overlooked problems associated with the data or the model. Elevated values for _refine_ls_R_factor_gt may be indicative of a need to recollect the data from a crystal of higher quality or to improve or correct the model. Consider the following:

(a) The absorption corrections are inadequate or inappropriate.

(b) The overall quality of the data may be poor due to the crystal quality.

(c) There is untreated twinning either in the form of unconsidered merohedral twinning or where overlap from the second twin domain in non-merohedral twins (which may have been ignored in the data collection) causes errors in the intensities of some reflections.

(d) The model is incorrect or incomplete in terms of incorrect element assignment, missing atoms or unmodelled or inadequately modelled disorder or solvent atoms.

IF _refine_ls_R_factor_obs has been used issue General ALERT

?? "_refine_ls_R_factor_obs is an old dataname which has been superceded by _refine_ls_R_factor_gt"

You are using an "old-fashioned", but still legal data name: _refine_ls_R_factor_obs. Please update the item to match the currently preferred name of _refine_ls_R_factor_gt. To ease this problem for the future, it is recommended that you upgrade or modify your CIF generating software accordingly.

IF neither _refine_ls_R_factor_gt or _refine_ls_R_factor_obs are present issue Gerneral ALERT

?? "Alert C Test not performed. _refine_ls_R_factor_gt is not present."

It is compulsory to report the conventional R-factor under the item _refine_ls_R_factor_gt. This data name is not present in your CIF or has not been assigned a value. Please insert the data item with an apropriate value.

(http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checking/RFACG_01.html)

例:RFACG01_ALERT_3_B The value of the R factor is > 0.10

?? ?????????R factor given? 0.129

警告原因:R因子不在預期范圍內。

解決策略:給出合理解釋即可。


CheckCIF-RFACG01的評論 (共 條)

分享到微博請遵守國家法律
丰城市| 松桃| 赞皇县| 象山县| 清苑县| 常山县| 昆明市| 成都市| 翼城县| 遂昌县| 长垣县| 夏河县| 芦山县| 萝北县| 鹿泉市| 出国| 昌黎县| 特克斯县| 清河县| 新晃| 尼玛县| 平湖市| 启东市| 吴忠市| 措勤县| 皮山县| 山西省| 虹口区| 洪洞县| 平阳县| 青田县| 涿鹿县| 类乌齐县| 滁州市| 新田县| 巧家县| 牙克石市| 万宁市| 皮山县| 大荔县| 永和县|